Suddenly the truth falls into place - there never would be a 'phase 2' of the Gaza ceasefire and peace plan. "Israel" has been in complete control of the war it started on October 7th 2023, but has worked in coordination with Western powers who arm it and provide supportive propaganda through their media networks. What's more, it is becoming increasingly evident that the plans for control over the Greater Middle East by those Western powers, working through their local attack dogs, are being coordinated with the other geo-political conflicts in which they are currently involved - Ukraine vs Russia and Sudan. While it has appeared for some time that NATO and "Israel" have been playing off the war in Ukraine with the genocide in Gaza - deflecting Western media attention from one or the other conflict to suit the narrative, diversion of this attention away from Gaza to "the fighting" and "humanitarian crisis" in Sudan has also been evident - at least to the conspiracy minded. What has just happened in Sudan has now confirmed that there has been such a conspiracy, and one conceived and engineered some time before "Israel's" genocidal war on Palestinians in Gaza. As I detailed in the previous article, Sudan's foreign diplomats have spoken forcefully against both the RSF and its chief sponsor the United Arab Emirates; in the following video clip the Sudanese ambassador to Egypt protests against the UAE's presence in 'the Quad' of countries convening to resolve the conflict between the Sudanese army and the RSF militia:
This Quad revealed itself only a day later, presenting a long-term plan to end the 'civil war' in Sudan, including provision of humanitarian relief and the formation of a civilian government. While admitting that this plan was devised and discussed earlier in September, apparently without including the Sudanese government, the parties to it presented the plan as an emergency resolution to 'stop the genocide' that had taken place only days earlier. Following this announcement, the RSF immediately agreed to the proposal - naturally enough given its sponsor the UAE had helped draft it - but also allowing for the reluctance of the Sudanese government to agree to it to be framed as obstruction. Thus the picture presented to the Western world by its media and governments was of a 'peace plan' supported by all countries who wanted to see an end to the killing and genocide, and with the cautious imprimatur of the UN. Indicating just who is behind this heavily biased presentation - hasbara in fact - it is no surprise to read an opinion piece in the Lowy Institute's "The Interpreter" that holds the Sudanese government entirely responsible for the conflict, along with allies Turkiye and Pakistan, which have both agree to supply Sudan with weaponry. (The Lowy Institute in Sydney is influential and unashamedly Zionist, supported by the Federal Government, private donors and corporations. Its founder and chief donor Sir Frank Lowy, travelled to Mandate Palestine in 1947 from Europe and fought with the Haganah terrorist group and then with the Golani Brigade, before moving to Australia in 1952.) It is impossible not to see a direct connection between the handling and manipulation of the conflict in Sudan and that in Gaza, when the main aggressors in both wars make the plans for their resolution in their favour, as well as controlling the media narrative to present themselves as the peacemakers. When they then come together under the supposed guidance of their main sponsor the United States to present and enact a plan for the 'final solution' in Gaza, the connection is proven, as in this following report from November 8th. (SBS' report included more on the hostages in Gaza at the start, and a glossy report on the return of 'schools' at the end, but the central section is most relevant.) In this extract note particularly the presence of different nationalities at the US coordination centre, including Australia, and the origin of the aid in Greek Cyprus.
There are of course problems with this report in what it leaves out. Most notably, given the failure of the World Central Kitchen's project to ship aid from Cyprus into Gaza using a floating pier, the report fails to mention where the ship will dock. Of the two possibilities - Ashdod in 'Israel' and El Arish in Egypt, the latter seems most likely, notwithstanding that shiploads of aid must already have reached there, some of which have traveled to Rafah and still wait to be allowed in. El Arish is also where the UAE has built desalination plants, according to Soumaia Ghannoushi, quoted in the previous article. As she also explains, the UAE has long been a white ant in the Arab world, collaborating with its enemies and their violent colonial proxy-state. In researching the early days of Russia's military operation in Ukraine, I stumbled on this report from March 29th 2022 of a significant meeting organised by "Israel's" foreign minister at the time, Yair Lapid, with the purpose of forming partnerships with willing Arab states - in this case with Egypt, Bahrain, Morocco and the UAE. Most significant in this report is the short speech by Sheikh bin Zaid al Nahyan, talking of how Egypt and "Israel" made peace in 1979, and regretting the failure to follow up in the 43 years since. The US Secretary Anthony Blinken joined the meeting, supporting the Abraham Accords. The report also notes that "Israel" 'put the meeting together in a matter of days', suggesting a reaction to something else happening on the global stage... which as it happened was the notorious Istanbul talks between Russian and Ukrainian representatives, mediated by Russian Jewish oligarch Roman Abramovich. This Guardian report focuses almost entirely on false claims of a 'Russian poisoning attempt', dismissing the whole idea of negotiation with the 'Russian aggressor' - but provides some useful background.
DM 11th November 2025